SEO Book.com |
Google's Effective 'White Hat' Marketing Case Study Posted: 15 Apr 2014 01:20 AM PDT There's the safe way & the high risk approach. The shortcut takers & those who win through hard work & superior offering. One is white hat and the other is black hat. With the increasing search ecosystem instability over the past couple years, some see these labels constantly sliding, sometimes on an ex-post-facto basis, turning thousands of white hats into black hats arbitrarily overnight. Are you a white hat SEO? or a black hat SEO? Do you even know? Before you answer, please have a quick read of this Washington Post article highlighting how Google manipulated & undermined the US political system. . Seriously, go read it now.It's fantastic journalism & an important read for anyone who considers themselves an SEO. . ###### Take the offline analog to Google's search "quality" guidelines & in spirit Google repeatedly violated every single one of them. Advertorials
Advertorials are spam, except when they are not: "the staff and professors at GMU's law center were in regular contact with Google executives, who supplied them with the company's arguments against antitrust action and helped them get favorable op-ed pieces published" Deception
Ads should be clearly labeled, except when they are not: "GMU officials later told Dellarocas they were planning to have him participate from the audience," which is just like an infomercial that must be labeled as an advertisement! Preventing Money from Manipulating Editorial
Money influencing outcomes is wrong, except when it's not: "Google's lobbying corps — now numbering more than 100 — is split equally, like its campaign donations, among Democrats and Republicans. ... Google became the second-largest corporate spender on lobbying in the United States in 2012." Content Quality
Payment should be disclosed, except when it shouldn't: "The school and Google staffers worked to organize a second academic conference focused on search. This time, however, Google's involvement was not publicly disclosed." Cloaking
cloaking is evil, except when it's not: Even as Google executives peppered the GMU staff with suggestions of speakers and guests to invite to the event, the company asked the school not to broadcast its involvement. "We will certainly limit who we announce publicly from Google" ...and on and on and on...
And while they may not approve of something, that doesn't mean they avoid the strategy when mapping out their own approach. There's a lesson & it isn't a particularly subtle one. Free markets aren't free. Who could have known? Categories: |
You are subscribed to email updates from SEO Book To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 |
No comments:
Post a Comment